Return
to Article Index
Be
Careful About Picking Beneficiaries for Your IRAs and 401(k)s
Inheriting
IRA or 401(k) proceeds from a friend or relative can be
a potentially huge windfall, but it can also be a sizable
tax headache. For both the giver and the recipient, it's
worth getting some advice.
Bank
accounts, stocks, real estate and life insurance proceeds
generally pass to heirs free of income tax. However, inherited
retirement benefits can be a different story. Beneficiaries
have to pay ordinary income tax on distributions from 401(k)
plans and traditional IRAs after they are inherited. (You
don't see the same problem with Roth IRAs – their benefits
can be free of income tax to your heirs if all tax requirements
are met.)
A
financial planning professional or an experienced tax advisor
can work with you based on your personal tax and estate
circumstances to determine an inheritance strategy that
is best for you. Some general guidelines:
Spouses
are the first stop: F ederal law dictates that
your surviving spouse must be the primary beneficiary of
your 401(k) plan benefit unless your spouse signs a waiver
to redirect those funds. Even with a traditional IRA, n
aming the spouse as the primary beneficiary may be an appropriate
option. Should the surviving spouse have his or her own
IRA, this approach would allow them to simply roll over
the assets from the decedent's IRA into their own. Furthermore,
if the surviving spouse is significantly younger than the
deceased, the surviving spouse would receive the added benefit
of stretching out distributions from the IRA until he or
she turns 70 1/2. The stretch-out allows the assets to continue
to grow on a tax- deferred basis, thereby maximizing asset
value and delaying any income tax due.
When
might you want to rethink a spousal beneficiary?
When the surviving spouse's estate is expected to be large
enough to exceed the applicable exclusion amount for federal
and state estate taxes. The applicable exclusion amount
after allowable expenses is $2 million in 2008 and above
$3.5 million in 2009. It should also be noted that in addition
to federal estate tax, many states impose a state tax on
estates with considerably lower asset levels (often anything
over $1,000,000). Proper estate planning may alleviate this
issue.
What
about non-spousal beneficiaries? Today, non-spouse
beneficiaries may be able to roll over all or a part of
inherited 401(k) benefits to an inherited IRA. A recent
change in IRS regulations still requires non-spousal heirs
to withdraw a minimum amount from Inherited IRA assets every
year, but it's based on the age of the recipient rather
than the age of the decedent.
Establishing
a Stretch IRA: Due to recent changes in the minimum
distribution law, taxpayers may now establish IRAs designed
to stretch out the time period over which a non-spouse beneficiary
(i.e. child) is required to take minimum distributions from
an inherited IRA. Proper use of this vehicle may potentially
allow for continued growth of tax-deferred earnings over
multiple generations and can have a substantial impact on
the future value of the family portfolio.
Naming
trusts or charities as beneficiaries. Placing
IRA assets in trust can have substantial advantages but
can be complex. It should only be considered after receiving
tax advice from a competent professional. It is particularly
important to get tax advice related to this issue. Trusts
can be complex instruments with which to bequeath assets,
and even though naming a charity as one's primary beneficiary
will not affect distributions in your lifetime, it could
affect the tax consequences for non-charitable beneficiaries
who are sharing the same asset upon your death.
October 2008
– This column was authored in cooperation with Financial
Planning Association.
|