Having trouble viewing
this page? Click here
Return
to Home Page
Weekly
Commentary - June 28, 2010
The
Markets - Can world governments "cut"
their way to prosperity?
It's
no secret that many countries are incurring large -- and
unsustainable -- budget deficits. What's interesting is
the approach each country is taking to try to lower their
deficits to a manageable level. Britain, Japan, Germany
and Greece, for example, are focused on cutting government
spending, according to Bloomberg, June 22. Conversely, the
U.S., while concerned about government spending, seems more
focused on keeping the stimulus spending alive and raising
taxes until (hopefully) the economy can catch fire and grow
on its own.
Who's
right?
According
to Harvard University professor Alberto Alesina, “There
have been mountains of evidence in which cutting government
spending has been associated with increases in growth, but
people still don't quite get it.” In addition, a study by
Ben Broadbent and Kevin Daly of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as reported by Bloomberg on June 22, "discovered that
reducing expenditures by 1 percentage point a year boosted
average annual growth by 0.6 percentage point. Raising the
ratio of taxes to GDP by the same margin cut growth by an
average 0.9 percentage point." And, from a stock market
perspective, the same report said, "The equity markets
of the countries that sliced spending beat those of other
advanced nations by 64% during a three-year period."
Like
many things related to finance and economics, we won't know
"who's right" until time passes and the market
delivers its verdict. Between now and then, expect the vigorous
debate on spending cuts versus stimulus spending to continue
among academics, investors, and world leaders.
| Data as
of 6/25/10 |
1-Week |
Y-T-D |
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
| Standard
& Poor's 500
(Domestic
Stocks) |
-3.6%
|
-3.4%
|
17.0%
|
-10.4%
|
-2.0%
|
-3.0%
|
| DJ
Global ex US
(Foreign
Stocks) |
-2.0
|
-8.6
|
13.9
|
-11.7
|
1.9
|
0.4
|
| 10-year
Treasury Note
(Yield
Only) |
3.1
|
N/A
|
3.6
|
5.1
|
3.9
|
6.1
|
| Gold
(per ounce) |
-0.2
|
13.6
|
33.8
|
24.4
|
23.3
|
16.0
|
| DJ-UBS
Commodity Index |
0.2
|
-7.5
|
3.1
|
-8.9
|
-4.2
|
2.1
|
| DJ
Equity All REIT TR Index |
-3.0
|
11.7
|
65.9
|
-6.7
|
1.7
|
10.6
|
Notes:
S&P 500, DJ Global ex US, Gold, DJ-UBS Commodity Index
returns exclude reinvested dividends (gold does not pay
a dividend) and the three, five, and 10-year returns are
annualized; the DJ Equity All REIT TR Index does include
reinvested dividends and the three-, five-, and 10-year
returns are annualized; and the 10-year Treasury Note
is simply the yield at the close of the day on each of
the historical time periods.
Sources:
Yahoo! Finance, Barron's, djindexes.com, London
Bullion Market Association.
Past
performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are
unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. N/A means
not applicable or not available.
Are
the financial markets "normally distributed,"
and should you even care? Consider this. The average height
of an American male is 69.4 inches, according to the National
Center for Health Statistics, Oct. 22, 2008. If we randomly
chose 1,000 American males and calculated their average
height, we would likely come up with a number close to 69.4
inches. Now, in an un-random fashion, let's assume we found
an eight-foot tall man --who is clearly an extreme outlier
-- and we have him join the previous group of 1,000. By
recalculating the data, we now find the average height of
this group of 1,001 men jumps by a very underwhelming
0.03 inches. In other words, adding an extremely tall
outlier to this group of average height men had very little
effect on the overall average height of the group. Without
getting too technical and assuming "tall outliers"
are just as likely to be found as "short outliers,"
we can say the height of men follows a "bell curve"
or a normal distribution.
By contrast,
let's consider the average net worth of American households.
According to the Federal Reserve, February 2009, the average
American family had a net worth of $556,300 in 2007. Like
above, if we randomly chose 1,000 families, this group would
probably have an average net worth near $556,300. However,
for fun, let's add Warren Buffett -- and his $40 billion
net worth -- to the group. Recalculating the data, we find
the average net worth of this group of 1,001 Americans jumps
to $40.5 million! Clearly, adding an extreme outlier to
this sample dramatically changed the average of the sample.
As it
relates to the financial markets, do you think their distribution
of returns looks more like the average height of American
men (where an extreme outlier doesn't really affect the
average) or the average net worth of American households
(where an extreme outlier could have an extreme impact)?
If you think the returns in financial markets look like
the average height of American men, but it turns out
they behave more like the average net worth of American
households , you could lose a lot of money. In fact,
much of modern portfolio theory is based on the assumption
that financial markets follow a normal distribution, i.e.,
they look like the average height of American men. Unfortunately,
experience suggests otherwise.
Warren
Buffett-type outliers such as the October 1987 stock market
crash, the 2000-2002 bursting of the internet bubble, the
2007-2009 bear market, the 2008 credit crisis, and last
month's "flash crash," suggest that the financial
markets are subject to large outliers that can significantly
affect your financial well-being. Knowing that, we do our
best to try to limit the damage to your portfolio if one
of these outliers occurs during your investing lifetime.
Weekly
Focus -- Think About It:
"In
the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer
than the windshield."
--
Warren Buffett
Notes:
- The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged
group of securities considered to be representative of
the stock market in general.
- The DJ Global ex US is an unmanaged group of non-U.S.
securities designed to reflect the performance of the
global equity securities that have readily available prices.
- The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the
United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government
is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year
Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.
- Gold represents the London afternoon gold price fix
as reported by the London Bullion Market Association.
- The DJ Commodity Index is designed to be a highly liquid
and diversified benchmark for the commodity futures market.
The Index is composed of futures contracts on 19 physical
commodities and was launched on July 14, 1998.
- The DJ Equity All REIT TR Index measures the total
return performance of the equity subcategory of the Real
Estate Investment Trust (REIT) industry as calculated
by Dow Jones.
- Yahoo! Finance is the source for any reference to the
performance of an index between two specific periods.
- Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice
and are not intended as investment advice or to predict
future performance.
- Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- You cannot invest directly in an index.
This summary
was prepared with assistance from PEAK.
This
material is for informational purposes only and is not intended
to provide specific advice or recommendations to any individual
or group. Before making any financial decisions or commitments,
please consult with your financial professional.
Securities
and financial planning offered through LPL
Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC.
|